Tuesday, March 17, 2009
At least they were consistent. They got everything wrong. First off, just the use of the name "Soprano" poisons that element of culture within any part of the Italian peninsula. It would be like portraying a bad Jewish family named "Mozaltov." It's outrageous, to say the least.
Second, the actors weren't even of Southern Italian origin, including James Gandolfini, who I was told is of Emilian origin, adding to the incorrigible nature of the scene. So here is this guy, who looks more Irish than Sicilian, carrying on about Italian defamation, and being Northern Italian of all things. Do you see how crazy this is? It actually passes for logic to many people.
Third, Meucci didn't invent the telephone, and we have already covered the fact versus fiction of that already. It's a myth carried on by people who probably wouldn't even identify themselves with Florentines anyway. Interestingly, the scene left out Columbus, Mazzei, Fermi, Verrazano, Marconi, Busti, Beltrami, Vigo, da Nizza, and many other "great Italians" in America who were, in fact, Northern Italians. I know that may irritate some, but look at it from our point of view for once please. Thinking of things from other points of view is part of critical thought, and usually helps one's own grievance as well. I realize that there are other ways of looking at this.
The problem with the issue of Italian defamation is a comparative one. Without stepping on toes, for now, maybe someone needs to do a study on dangerous secret societies and subversive movements in American history, and line them all up for examination. I know that "subversive" is an ambiguous term. What is subversive for some, is good for others. However, line them up, take in account all pertinent information, have no group getting "special protection," and see what it looks like. I suspect that there would be many, many bruised egos; and I also suspect that there would be no "Northern Italian groups."
I know for an absolute fact that many ethnic groups, from numerous races, do receive special protection from media exposure, and members of those dangerous secret societies have done tremendous harm to our country.
I wanted to add, and I think it's somewhat relative enough to this subject, one ethnic group which endured tremendous loss within this land. REAL loss too. That being the Cajuns. They were forced out of Canada, and force-migrated to Louisiana by the British. Literally millions died! We never hear about that, and it happened here; albeit not at the hands of Americans.
3-28-09 Addition: I came across one item that I wanted to add here, but didn't want to devote another entry for. I'm not trying to make a mountain out've a mole hill, but wanted to briefly touch upon it.
From YouTube user pjccannella: "Italians bult America!!! we brought them great food great singers great craftsman we built the capital building!! and the white house! and they still call us w**s!.......... while they eat are great food an listen to are great singers and try to learn our arts! columbus is only the begining. there needs to be a day for us Italian Americans we found and built this country and we dont get any credit! why is saint patricks day such a big deal what the hell did the irish do for this country? columbus day is a joke! where known for a hell of alot more than that! sorry to sound angry but im sick of takeing a back seat to other coltures that have not done nothing for this country.We are the chosen people just look at our histroy! nobody can touch us."
I had to censor one word, as to not have problems with blogspot. As to who "built America," which I'm assuming is a reference to the America that was once the best in almost every human endeavor at one point, I think that some demographic groupings contributed more than others. It's still somewhat of a moronic statement to say that "we built America." Yes, the traditional "Italian-Americans" did their share as paving the roads and laying the bricks, but so did many others.
As far as food, all cuisine of the Italian peninsula is very good or great, so I think he has a point there. The great singers and musicians in America were of Southern Italian descent. As far as building the capitol building, those were Florentines if I remember correctly. The craftmanship and art of Northern Italians is second to none in the world. Sure, there can be some very good stone masonry in Southern Italy and other places, but I don't think he's really on the level here.
His only really valid point is Columbus Day, and Columbus as a "politically incorrect" figure. Someone could argue that Saint Patrick is politically incorrect for bringing Vatican power into Ireland. The Vatican is one of the most powerful banking institutions in the world. Also, this all but eliminated the native spirituality/religions in the country. So, therefore, the Columbus question is one that can't be solved. Either an individual believes that there should have been an America, or not. There can be no compromise there. I have a lot more to say about that, and tons of inconvenient facts to present, but I will save that, for now.
I get a strong impression that pjccannella's master list of "Italian and Italian-American" accomplishments were those of Florentines, Genoese, Torinese, Milanese, Venetians, etc. C'mon, most Italian-Americans in NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, etc., never met a single person of Northern Italian decent in their cities, in their entire lives. It's the theory of "Italian-Americans," but not the reality.
Monday, March 16, 2009
It appears that many people forget that the dog has been with us for thousands of years. Humans and domesticated wolves, in Europe and apparently parts of western Asia and India, teamed up in pre-history in order to help each other survive. Each possessing traits that the other lacked. Even more-so than the horse or cat, the dog is a deep part of our history.
From the Wikipedia entry Canidae: "Canidae is the biological family of the dogs; a member of this family is called a canid. They include wolves, foxes, coyotes, and jackals. The Canidae family is divided into the "true dogs" of the tribe Canini and the "foxes" of the tribe Vulpini. The two species of the basal Caninae are more primitive and do not fit into either tribe.
"Canids and humans
"One canid, the domestic dog, long ago entered into a partnership with humans and today remains one of the most widely kept domestic animals in the world and serves humanity in a great many important ways. Most experts believe the domestic dog is descended from an Asian subspecies of the Gray Wolf.
"Among canids, only the gray wolf has been known to prey on humans. There is at least one record of a coyote killing a toddler, and two of golden jackals killing children. Some canid species have also been trapped and hunted for their fur and, especially the Gray Wolf and the Red Fox, for sport. Some canids are now endangered in the wild due to hunting, habitat loss, and the introduction of diseases from domestic dogs."
From the Wikipedia entry Gray Wolf: "The grey wolf or gray wolf (Canis lupus), also known as the timber wolf or simply wolf, is the largest wild member of the Canidae family. It is an ice age survivor originating during the Late Pleistocene around 300,000 years ago. DNA sequencing and genetic drift studies reaffirm that the gray wolf shares a common ancestry with the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Although certain aspects of this conclusion have been questioned, including recently, the main body of evidence confirms it. A number of other gray wolf subspecies have been identified, though the actual number of subspecies is still open to discussion. Gray wolves are typically apex predators in the ecosystems they occupy. Though not as adaptable as more generalist canid species, wolves have thrived in temperate forests, deserts, mountains, tundra, taiga, grasslands, and even urban areas.
"Though once abundant over much of Eurasia and North America, the gray wolf inhabits a very small portion of its former range because of widespread destruction of its territory, human encroachment of its habitat, and the resulting human-wolf encounters that sparked broad extirpation. Even so, the gray wolf is regarded as being of least concern for extinction according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, when the entire gray wolf population is considered as a whole. Today, wolves are protected in some areas, hunted for sport in others, or may be subject to extermination as perceived threats to livestock and pets.
"In areas where human cultures and wolves are sympatric, wolves frequently feature in the folklore and mythology of those cultures, both positively and negatively."
Sunday, March 8, 2009
The above music video is from a band called La Scelta, and it is entitled 'La Grande Danza' ("the great dancer"). It's a very catchy song. La Scelta plays what is considered Celtic-style music, which is probably based on traditional music from the modern "Celtic nations." It would have to be, because we don't know what kind of music ancient Celts may have composed. La Scelta has their offical website, as well as their YouTube channel.*************************************************************************
Along with the "Sun of the Alps," another Celtic symbol which is tied into the history of mainly the ancient continental Celts, is the "Triple Spiral." A tiny number of Irish people occasionally proclaim to various movements to "stop using OUR symbols" (Celtic symbols). Actually, the Sun of the Alps and the Triple Spiral are not identified with the British Isles at all, and the original Celts were living on the European mainland long before migrating there. It's not clear at all as to what the ancient Celts may have looked like, or what Indo-European sub-stock they may have belonged to. What may be a modern "Irish look(s)," could actually be inherited from Vikings or some other migrating people in that nation's history.
[6-28-09 UPDATE: I may have been mistaken regarding the knowledge of ancient Celtic music. The evidence seems to show me that there was some knowledge based on the instruments, therefore I retract the statement that "we could not" have known about their music.]
Friday, March 6, 2009
The following is another entry from Insubria87, and is from his entry on the PAL Yahoo Group, entitled 'History of Piedmont and its language.'
|History of Piedmont and its language|
These short notes are certainly not exhaustive and probably not completely accurate. I hope, anyway, that possible errors are not so big. As already said, I try to do a good work, in spite of all my limits. My goal is to give something acceptable. Of cours, if someone wants to know exactly or know more on the subject, he would better to find books written by "true experts". Some valuable researchers have written very interestng books about. If these few notes are able to stmulate some interest on the subject, it would already be a good success.
The Palaeolithic period
We have some traces of inhabitants in Piedmont that go back to at least 100,000 years ago. About that period we do not know so much. Certainly there were very few people in the Paleolithic age. The piedmontese land was surely inhospitable, cold and wild. The lowland was marshy, hills and low mountais were covered by intricate forrests, higher on mountains the ice was the king.
From Neolithic to Romans
In the Neolithic period, the situation was better. We know about villages, hunters and farmers, and people were much more. Beyond things of the common life, they left us a number of engravings , rupestrian inscriptions, whose meaning is not yet completely clear. We know something more about the first inhabitants of Piedmont starting from about 2000 years B.C. In the area there were people that we now call "Ligurians". This population, probably, didn't have an indo-european root and language, and probably, they came from Iberian region. This population was distributed in South of the present France, and in North-West of the present Italy.
We know that, at the beginning of the Bronze Age, the alpine passes of Monsnever, Monsniss, Gran San Bernard, Cit San Bernard where already used. Piedmont exported copper and imported tin. In the Iron Age the Piedmont started to exchange goods eastward with the plane of the Po.
About 700 years B.C. another population reached the Piedmont, coming from the present France and Switzerland. This popularion was called "Celts". They were bellicose people, if we consider the large amount of arms that could be found, but, probably due to the fact that they came in little groups for a long period, they merged completely with Ligurians without fighting and gave origin at a new population, so called Celt-Ligurians, a new language, new traditions, as a result of this complete merging. We don't have a direct knowledge of their language, even if we can notice, without any doubt, in piedmontese, some words coming from their language, and some toponyms. For example the present word "dru" (meaning "fruitful") is coming from celtic, as well as the place-names ending by ...asch, ....asca (Beinasch, Cherasch, Airasca, val Germanasca, and so on).
Etruscans, starting from Tuscany, enlarged their territory northward up to the present Lombardy, but they did not enter in Piedmont. Anyway they had some commercial basis in Piedmont. Greeks had a colony on south of France (territory of the present Marseille), and they had some interaction with Piedmont. The relation with nearneighbours were anyway not so strong to influence heavily the life in Piedmont, that remained quite isolated. This also produced a delay in adopting new technologies.
The first contacts with Romans happened about the year 200 b. C. The occasion was the end of the wars between Rome and Carthago. During these wars the piedmontese tribes supported Carthago (Hannbal crossed the Piedmont with his army) and the fact was a reason for Romans to start the occupation of Piedmont. At the beginning, and for many years, they just enter the eastern part of the region, and had a couple of strongholds immediately West the Ticino river. They only did some incursions westward. In that period Romans were not yet interested in Alpine passes toward Europe.
In the first century b. C. it became important, to Rome, having safe ways toward Europe, Gaul and Helvetia (present France and Switzerland). So they pushed more in deep their occupation, in order to have the control of the ways through the mountains. There were many local wars and revolts in controlled territories, up to the year 25 b. C. when Augustus won the battle against Salassi and got the militar control of the region. From one side, a part of piedmontese population tried to keep away Romans seeking for freedom in high walleys on mountais, on the other side Romans didn't like Piedmont, an inhospitable land, cold and populated by hostile inhabitants, far away from Roman culture.
Only after the death of the emperor Nero, and the following civil war (about 70 a. C.) a true latinization of the region started. Latin (even if just known by few people) and local celtic-ligurian language started to mix, giving rise at the basis for a neo-Latin language, in which the celtic root was very influent. As it was usual for Romans, a part of the conquered land was assigned to legionaries that left the military service. Often these legionaries came from different parts of the Empire, and this added ethnic and linguistic elements. In the fourth century Piedmont was involved in the war between Constantine and Maxentius. After this war Constantine, in order to strengthen the roads defence, moved in Piedmont quite a number of Sarmatians, while a colony of Dalmatians was already present in the Augusta Taurinorum (Turin) area. Also these facts introduced further ethnic and linguistic elements. But at this point in time the Roman Emperor was starting the last, final crisis.
Starting from the years around 300 a.C. the Roman Empire had to face at a problem. Populations near its border were pressing and trying to enter in the territory of the Empire. In turn, these populations were pushed towards the Empire by tribes coming from Asia. For a while Rome was able to manage the situation, by letting some tribes to enter inside borders, and by controllig these movings. But the Empire was too large, and Romans had lost the past force. They were no more a monolithic structure and they had also to face at a series of internal fights. Submitted populations became more and more hostile.
The Christianity in Piedmont
The Christianity arrived in Piedmont at the end of the third century and beginning of the fourth century. It was first, probably, introduced by merchants and travellers. In fact in the first years the new religion was mixed with previous creeds, giving raise to something not so orthodox. Then in Piedmont there were great bishops like Saint Gaudentius, Saint Eusebius, Saint Maximus that brought Christianity on the correct way. After the Edict of Milan that recognized officially the Christianity, bishops in Piedmont gained a large importance, and becomes reference points, also for culture e civilization. Even more when barbarians that had invaded Italy became Christians. This was particularly important in the dark period that was coming.
Populations outside the Empire borders were called Barbarian, their civilization level was quite low, but they were very strong and determinated. So, at a given time, the situation went out of the Rome's control, and the infiltrations became true invasions. Barbarian large tribes began to occupy and devastate the Europe.
The Empire was no more in the position of reacting efficiently. It was subdivided into two parts, the western with Rome as a capital and the eastern with Constantinople as a capital. At the end of fourth century Italy was directly involved in barbarian invasions. In Piedmont, after some success, Romans were quickly no more in the position of controlling alpine passes, so bands of marauders arrived from Alps destrojing and robbing. All sort of populations crissed the Piedmont, and at the same time all the roman organization was ruining.
The wester Empire ruined and ended in the year 476, and Italy remains under the dominion of Odoacre, king of Erulians. The Piedmont, in a first time, was quite a fringe area with respect these events.
At the back of Alps in Gaul, the population of Burgundians occupied the territory, while a new barbarian population, the Ostrogoths With their king Theodoric, invaded Italy from north-east. So Burgundians, in war against Ostrogoths, invaded and wasted the Piedmont in order to stop Ostrogoths. Theodoric won the war and occupied Piedmont. He managed to surveil alpine passes, and for some years Piedmont had a bit of rest. A goth, Sisige, some years later, became a governor in part of Piedmont, and had a sort of dukedom. Around the year 550 the eastern Roman Empire managed for a while to reconquere Italy. Sisige became an allied of the Empire, and maintained his position.
Longobards and Franks
In the year 568 (or 569?) a new invasion took place. A complete population, the Longobards coming from the central Europe, occupied the Po Walley, and enlarged this occupation up to Piedmont. Beyond the Alps Burgundians and Franks were pressing, They occupied high walleys, on mountains, and the border line between Franks and Longobards was near the end of walleys, toward the Po Walley. The piedmontese territory was subdivided in dukedoms controlled anyway by the Longobard king. It is difficult to evaluate how many Longobards moved and stayed on piedmontese territory. We know anyway that in that period, not only Longobards lived in Piedmont, but also colonies of other European populations like Bulgarians and Saxons. Certainly the Piedmont received an ethnical and linguistic contribution from Longobards. Also Longobard language left in Piedmontese some words and some toponyms. For example the place-names ending by ...engh, ...enga are nouns of Longobard origin (Murisengh, Aramengh, and so on).
Equilibrium between Longobards and Franks was quite unstable. Longobards menaced the pope's territory, the pope asked for help at Franks, and the war started. Of course Piedmont was the first territory invaded. It was about the middle of VII century. Franks were the winners, and the Longobard kingdom disappeared.
The whole Europe became then the frankish Carolingian Empire. Piedmontese people and Franks had a common Celthic root, and in better times, commercial contacts were frequent between the two populations. Further linguistic and ethnic elements were absorbed by Piedmont.
Piedmont was again subdivided into marchlands. The fights among these marchlands characterized for long time the history of Piedmont. Also Carolingians, as already had done Longobards after their conversion to Cristianity, had to look for help of Bishops and Abbeys in order to moderate the civil power, which, being very decentralized, was also hardly controlled. Local Vassals, in their marchland, were actually sovereigns, and gave rise at a very complex plot of alliances, fights, marriages, in order to obtain rights and favours and increase their power. In this period, Curias and Abbeys were the depositaries and carekater of the culture. They also had some privileges, given by the Emperor.
The Saracens and Hungars
At the end of IX century (year 887) the Carolingian Empire flaked off and was subdivided into the tree kingdoms of Germany, France, Italy. But at the same time the problem for Europe was Saracens raids and invasions. Saracens managed to have a stable base on the mediterranean coast of France (Provence), and from this point they, in X century they did raids and occupations in Piedmont (that sometime lasted for years). Western Alps and North-West Apennines have quite a number of "Saracens towers", and toponyms that can be referred to Saracens. Alpine passes became impracticable, the abbey of Novalesa (an important abbey in Susa's walley) was destrojed. These facts slowed downd the development of the region, but certainly brought cultural and technical elements that would have been useful later, and added also some ethnic element in the region.
From East other raids came, that arrived quite close to Turin, made by Hungars. Local Vassals, always fighting among them, were not able to oppose efficently, at least up to the end of X century, when the problem was solved.
After these events, what about language?
From what we have seen so far, we note that Piedmont was a "border land", where many different people passed and stayed. The starting basis of the language was a mix of Ligurian and Celtic. On this basis the Latin was inserted, even if Piedmont was always marginal to the Rome's culture. Then German (Gothic and Longobard) and French cultural and linguistic elements were added, as well as, but at a lower level, mainly Saracens elements (Hungarians probably did not influence so much, in this sense).
The structure of the language was taken from Latin, that was "adapted" to the Celthic-Ligurian preceding language, and enriched with many other linguistical elements coming from North Europe, and the most important influence was from Franks, whose language had a common root with the language of the region. The preceeding history arrives to the year 1000 more or less. The official language is the Latin, but people does not speak anymore Latin. In the region probably different languages are spoken, but they have a common structure. Latin words are changing, and the way in which they change in Piedmont is dfifferent from the way these words change in Florence or in Rome. Certainly in Piedmont there is a strong French influence, but it is not possible to conclude that Piedmontese and French or Piedmontese and Provençal could be the same language, probably not even in the year 1000. Even more there is difference between Piedmontese and Italian, and this would have appeared when written documents had been compared. At that moment the only writings were in Latin.
Certainly, in this period, very few people was able to write and read, and probably these were the only people knowing Latin. Probably this is the reason for the first piedmontese writing we know. It is of some year around 1150, and is a collection of Sermons (see the section "literature"). Sermons translated in the tongue of people in order to be understood. For characteristics of this language see the section "An independent language".
The first Princes in Piedmont
The medieval history of Piedmont, in particular in its first part, was extremely complex. A short summary is difficult and hardly could be acceptably precise. In spite of this we try to do it. The context was a kingdom of Italy that was more theoretical than practical, due to the fights among who supposed his rignt of being the king. A german king that became also king of Italy and founded a new Empire. The Pope was often in contrast with the Emperor, trying to preserve his independence, while he was losing political influence. Curias and Abbeys were not any more the civil and cultural reference. The great powers (like the Emperor) needed the help of little local Lords, and in order to obtain loyalty the higher levels of the power gave rights and lands to the lower levels. The fight was potentially of all against all, and in this scenario alliances (not so stable) and marriages, questoin of inheritance, and so on, produced a deep tangle, in which declared enemies were less dangerous than relatives of family.
The evolution of carolingian feuds in Piedmont put in evidence Arduino (the Marquis of Ivrea), Olderico Manfredi (the Marquis of Turin) and his daughter Adelaide. Around thiese subjects the first part of the game was played. Arduino obtained to be recognized as King of Italy, but the role became useless when, immediately after, the king of Germany became Emperor also in Italy. The marchland of Ivrea disappeared and Olderico Manferdi obtained some rights on it. The daughter Adelaide inheritates the rights on Turin and Ivrea, and after a series of marriagesin which always remained widow, married Oddone, the son of Umberto Biancamano, duke of Savoy. Adelaide, widow again, became Lord over Savoy, Turin and Ivrea. When Adelaide deaded, the son Umberto II, had serious problems in assuming the control of the state, since others were pretending rights on Turin. Umberto II was compelled to leave Turin, that stayed under the control of Bonifacio del Vasto. In the meanwhile the Dauphin occupied part of the high walleys of the Turin marchland. For the moment the Savoy could not re-obtain the piedmontese territory.
Other two Marquisates assumed a great importance in the region: The Marquisate of Saluzzo (Salusse) and the Marquisate of Monferrato (Monfrà). For growing attempts or for surviving, these marquisates were involved in more or less continuous wars, at which also the Visconti of Milan participated with the scope of expanding the ducate of Milan towards Piedmont.
But a new democratic experience was raising, the Communes. These city-republics were changing the map of the power, and the opposition to this by preceding Lords and Emperor were preparing other wars.
The period of Communes
Birth and development of the Communes, in Piedmont was characterized by complex events and fights. Starting from about the century XII some Piedmontese cities, and other cities in northern and central Italy experienced a type of self goverment, more or less democratic (as far as we can speak of democracy in that period). An opposition to these communes, mainly came from the Marquis of Monfrà, even more than from the Emperor. This one, in fact, was not absolutely against the experience, but tried to maintain the control on communes. In this play, alternatively some communes were allied of the Emperor and some other against. In this context, the Savoy House continued to attempt of re-obtaining the lands of what it was the marchland of Adelaide. Still they didn't reach the goal, even if they could have some lands to the prejudice of the marquisates of Salusse and of Monfrà. In the piedmontese communes, for writing regulations and similar, often was used the Piedmontese, and some of these documents are still preserved in some archives.
In this context appeared on the political scenario of Piedmont, Charles D'Angiò, the brother of the France's king Louis IX. Charles D'Angiò married a daughter of the Count of Provence. He entered in Piedmont from Nice and the Roya walley. Beyond the Tende pass he arrived in Cuneo (Coni) territory, and went toward Turin. He didn't had a strong army, but he offered concrete advantages to Piedmontese cities, mainly for commerce, since it would be easier to bring goods to the sea. Besides, between Piedmontese and Provençal people there were a good feeling. Then, also the internal fights made it week the region. The only sir that could oppose was the Monreà's Marquis, but this latter was trying to conquere Alessandria and preferred to find a compromise with Charlles D'Angiò. Provençals then occutied lands o the prejudice of the marquisates of Salusse and of Monfrà and the state of Savoy.
Angevins has also occupied the southern Italy and defeated Swabians. This determined an easy expansion of Angewins also in Piedmont.
The Pontifical state was worried of these successes, and organized an alliance against Angewins. This alliance compelled Charles D'Angiò to leave the Piedmont. The Savoy, of course, attempted to utilize the situation for re-otain Turin and its land.
Influences on language
We saw before that an old form of Piedmontese was used in XII century for writing texts mainly of religious character. We have already seen that during the Communes period, Piedmontese was used for regulations and other similar documents. Certainly French and Provençal languages, in the Angewin period had way of influencing the tongue of Piedmont. In any case this influence was on lexicon, and was only marginal on structure. In fact we can notice something in syntax, but grammar remained quite original, with particularities that are not present in French and Provençal and, of course, not in Italian. A further French and Provençal influence tere was when Waldenses were compelled to leave France and found refuge in piedmontese alpine walleys. Still nowadays, in Piedmont, Waldensian walleys are of French mother tongue. Finally we don't have to ferget the French origins of Savoy House. Beyond Piedmontese, (and Provençal on mountains), in Piedmont French language was more used than Italian. French and Provençal culture heavily influenced the Piedmontese culture.
Savoy and Acaja
Whwn Charles D'Angiò left the Piedmont, the Savoy was in the condition of having back their old piedmontese territories and of re-entering in Turin. For inheritance problems, the Savoy House was subdivided into three branches. One of the three, whose holder was Philip of Savoy, had the piedmontese territories. Also the Marquis of Salusse was under the influence of Savoy, even if not part of the State. Philip of Savoy married Isabel of Villehardouin which was the holder of a lordship on Morea and Acaja. It was just a theoretical lordship, but nevertheless Philip of Savoy took the appellation of "Prince of Acaja". The piedmontese branch of Savoy House was called the "princely branch", the french one was called the "ducal branch", and the third was the "Vaud branch".
The century XIV
There were internal fights in a large and important Commune in Piedmont, the city of Asti (Ast). The marquis of Monfrà, always trying to re-conquere the city, was engaged in this question. Other actors on the piedmontese scene were Acaja, Savoy that continued to interfere, marquisates of Monrà and Salusse, other piedmontese communes, and the Visconti, lords of Milan, that wanted to expand their lands toward Piedmont. A complex situation in which the borders of the various states were continuously changing.
In this situation, Charles II D'Angiò, recognized the opportunity of re-entering in Piedmont. As in the first time for his parent, also in that moment he could easily occupy a very large land. Still that time the power of Angevins was not based on army, indeen quite poor, but on favour of population, that had advantages, and on the actual absence of a true oppositor.
Around the half of '300, a dangerous fact happened for Savoy and Acaja. The marquis of Salusse left the marquisate to the Dauphin, of whom he became a vassal. In this way the Dauphin became a serious problem for Savoy and Acaja, and in fact the Dauphin managed to occupy some lands on Savoyard mountains, and few years later the Dauphinate was annexed to the powerful France, that became the direct oppositor to Savoy.
Then Savoy took the direct control of some piedmontese land, the Acaja saw their importance reduced, the Visconti of Milan managed to obtain some territories in Piedmont. From Amadeus IV (so called Green Count) on, Savoy acquired more importance in Piedmont. In Europe the Hundred Years' War was in progress, and it would have been followed by the war between France and Spain. In this context Angewins were defeated again and left Piedmont.
The Piedmont toward a Savoyard State
In 1418 the Acaja dinasty extinguished, and Amadeus VIII took again the lordship of Piedmont. The first-born of Savoy Dukes assumed the title of "Prince of Piedmont".
At the beginning of '400, the cities of Vercelli (Versèj), Novara (Noara), Alessandria (Lissàndria) and Tortona (Torton-a) were under the control of Visconti (Milan). Also Asti (Ast) and Ceva were two cities under the Visconti's control. These two cities came back to Savoy for a usual, but in this case complex, mechanism of inheritance, marriages and peace treary of one of the continuous wars of the period (in 1531 the end of the process). The dinasty of the Marquis of Monfrà extinguished, but the Savoy couldn't obtain it. The Emperor assigned it to the Duke of Mantua. In the same time, the France occupied the Savoyard lands in Piedmont and used the Piedmont as a basis for the war against Spain in Italy. Also Spanish soldiers entered and fighted in Piedmont. For about 27 years the Piedmont was considered a French land. In 1548 also the dinasty of Marquis of Salusse estinguished and the marquisate was annexed to France. In the meanwhile Spanish conquered Ast (the well known city) and Santhià (another city on the way between Turin and Milan). From a linguistical point of view, this was still a period of french influence on piedmontese lexicon, and spanish as well. As far as literature is concerned, this period was too dreadful for leaving room at it.
At the end of the French-Spanish war (peace treary of Cateau-Cambrésis in 1559) Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy had again the lordship on the Savoyard lands in Piedmont, and in 1574 had back from Spain the cities of Ast and Santhià. Around the end of '500 the Savoy ducate included the french Savoy and the Piedmont without the cities of Novara, Tortona, Alessandria, without the marquisate of Monfrà, and without the lands that had been the marquisate of Salusse. The Dauphinate (France) still included the high walleys of Susa and Chisone (westward Turin). Then the religion wars started and Charles Emanuel I of Savoy was able to occupy the lands Salusse, that became part of the Savoy state in the year 1601.
In that period alliances were changing quickly. At the beginning of XVII century Piedmont and France are allied against Spanish (which were in Milan). But then the Piedmont found a compromise with Spain for a subdivision of the marquisato of Monfrà. In this way the Piedmont was again in contrast with France. In the meanwhile still a question arose of regency in minor age of the Duke. The regency was of Royal Madam Cristine, very connected with France (she called herself "Cristine of France"), and again actually the Piedmont became a vassalage of the France's king. In these circumstances the Cardinal Richelieu attempted to annex Piedmont to France. But again things were changing.
This was the period in which the Piedmontese language reached its completion.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Thousand-year-old Lombard warrior skeleton discovered buried with horse in Italy
Italian archaeologists have discovered a perfectly preserved skeleton of a 1400-year-old Lombard warrior, buried with his horse.
By Malcolm Moore in Rome - London Telegraph - May 28, 2008
The skeleton, which was found in a park at Testona, near Turin, is of a 25-year-old Lombard who died of a fever. Unusually, his horse was buried alongside him.
"This is a very rare find," said Gabriella Pantò, the archaeologist leading the dig. "We have not seen many precedents in Italy. We have seen horses' heads buried with warriors, but this find shows the area is vitally important," she added.
The Lombards were a nomadic tribe of Germans who settled near the Danube and launched an attack on Italy in the sixth century.
Under the leadership of King Alboin, the Lombards stormed across the Alps in the spring of AD568 with an army of around 500,000.
Vicenza, Verona and Brescia were quickly conquered from the Byzantines, who were still suffering from battling the Goths. Lombardy was established across the whole of the north of the country, an empire which lasted for around 100 years.
The dig revealed a Lombard camp had settled at Testona, and the skeleton of a dog was also found nearby. The invaders had built an aqueduct and irrigation system and a series of small wooden huts, without any foundations.
The warrior was also buried with a treasure chest being x-rayed by archaeologists. In addition, a small bag held a pair of pincers, a bronze belt buckle and some armour.
He wore a ring on his left index finger and also had both a knife and a "scramasax", a short sword designed for close combat.
'Thousand-year-old Lombard warrior skeleton discovered buried with horse in Italy'
Monday, March 2, 2009
[Thanks to Insubria87 for this entry: His original post 'Early Celtic Presence in Northern Italy']
EARLY CELTIC PRESENCE IN NORTHERN ITALY
People of European History
The Celts of the Latène age (475 to 20 BC) are named for the important archaeological finds at La Tène on the lake of Neuchâtel in Switzerland and are counted among the most important people of European history. Their central area of influence stretched from the Marne and Mosel, over southern France, and southern Germany, reaching to southern Poland and the Carpathians. The actual origins of the Celts is unknown. Myths and legends give a very contradictory picture.
Origins and Early History
Clear references to the history of the Celts are first found in the late Bronze age (the 13th century BC) with the beginning of the Canegrate culture. The name comes from the archaeological excavation at "Canegrate" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canegrate) near Legnano north of Milan, where important finds were made. The Canegrate culture was founded by Celts who came from the Northwest alpine region and settled in the area between the Lake of Maggiore and the Lake of Como. They brought a language with them from which "Old-Celtic" continuously developed. They lived in direct proximity to the Golasecca-Celts of the Ticino (their name stems from the important archaeological finds in "Golasecca" at the place where the Ticino river flows out of the Lake of Maggiore) and the Helvetians in the north whose settlements reached far towards southern Germany.
The Golasecca culture is a proto-historic pre-Celtic culture in northern Italy of which the type-site is Golasecca in the province of Varese, Lombardy (northern Italy). Sites characteristic of Golasecca culture have been identified in eastern Lombardy, Piedmont, the Canton Ticino and Val Mesolcina, in a territory stretching north of the Po River to sub-alpine zones, between the course of the Serio to the east and the Sesia to the west. The site of Golasecca, where the Ticino exits from Lake Maggiore, was particularly suitable for long-distance exchanges, in which Golaseccans acted as intermediaries between Etruscans and the Halstatt culture of Austria, supported on the all-important trade in salt.
In a broader context, the subalpine Golasecca culture is the very last expression of the Middle European Urnfield culture of the European Bronze Age. The culture's richest flowering was Golasecca II, in the first half of the sixth to early fifth centuries BCE. It lasted until it was overwhelmed by the Celts in the fourth century and was finally incorporated into the hegemony of the Roman Republic.
situation of the Golasecca culture to the south of the Hallstatt culture.
Golasecca culture is divided for convenient reference into three parts: the first two cover the period of the ninth to the first half of the fifth century BCE; the third, coinciding with La Tène A-B of the later Iron Age in this region and extending to the end of the fourth century BCE, is marked by increasing Celtic influences, culminating in Celtic hegemony after the conquests of 388 BCE. The very earliest finds are of the Late Bronze Age (ninth century), apparently building upon a local culture.
Cremation near the burial site, followed by ash and bone burials in terracotta jars, in excavated pits set at determined distances one from the other in scattered necropolises, characterize a culture of many small village settlements.
In Golasecca culture some of the first evolved characteristics of historic society may be seen, in the specialized use of materials and the adaptation of the local terrain. The early-period habitations were circular wooden constructions along the edge of the river's floodplain; each was built on a low basement of stone round a central hearth and floored with river pebbles set in clay. Hand-shaped ceramics, made without a potter's wheel, were decorated in gesso. The use of the wheel is known from the carts in the Tomb of the Warrior at the Sesto Calende site. Amber beads from the Baltic sea across the Amber Road and obsidian reveal networks of long-distance trade. From the seventh century onwards some tombs contain burial goods imported from Etruscan areas and Greek objects
The settlements depended on domesticated animals: remains reveal the presence of goats, sheep, pigs, cattle and horses. Some legume and cereal crops were cultivated; nuts and fruits were collected. The dugout boats from Castelletto Ticino and Porto Tolle are conserved at the museum of Isola Bella. Metal, though rare, was in increasing use.
Undeciphered written characters are found incised in ceramics or on stone.
The Golasecca culture is best known by its burial customs, where an apparent ancestor cult imposed respect of the necropoli, a sacred area untouched by agrarian use or deforestation. The early-period burials took place in selected raised positions oriented with respect to the sun. Burial practices were direct inhumation or in lidded cistae. Stone circles and alignments are found. Burial urns were painted with designs, with accessory ceramics, such as cups on tall bases. Bronze objects are usually of wearing apparel: pins and fibulas, armbands, rings, earrings, pendants and necklaces. Bronze vessels are rare. The practice of cremation persists into the second period (early sixth to mid-fourth centuries)
The old sites—Golasecca, Sesto Calende, Castelletto Ticino—maintained their traditional autochthonous character through the sixth century, when outside influences begin to be detectable. At the beginning of the fifth century, pastoral practices resulted in the development of new settlements in the plains.
The first finds were discovered at several locations in the comune of Golasecca in 1824, by the antiquarian abate Giovan Battista Giani, who identified the clearly non-Roman burials as remains of the battle between Hannibal and Scipio Africanus. In 1865 Louis Laurent Gabriel de Mortillet, a founder of European archaeology, rightly assigned the same tombs to the early Iron Age. The modern assessment of Golasecca culture is derived from the campaigns of 1965-69 on Monsorino, directed by Mira Bonomi.
The Lepontii were an ancient people occupying portions of Rhaetia (in modern Switzerland and Italy) in the Alps during the time of the Roman conquest of that territory. The Lepontii have been variously described as a Celtic, Ligurian, Raetian, and Germanic tribe. However, most evidence, including recent archeological excavations, and their association with the 'Golasecca culture' of Northern Italy, indicates a Celtic origin although they might actually be an amalgamation of Raetians (who were of Etruscan origin) and Celts.
The chief town of the Lepontii was Oscela, now Domodossola, Italy, and their territory included the southern slopes of the St. Gotthard Pass and Simplon Pass, corresponding roughly to present-day Ossola and Ticino. See also: Lepontic language. This map of Rhaetia  shows the location of the Lepontic territory, in the south-western corner of Rhaetia. The area to the South, including what was to become the Insubrian capital Mediolanum (modern Milan), was Etruscan around 600-500 BC, when the Lepontii began writing tombstone inscriptions in their alphabet (one of several Etruscan-derived alphabets in the Rhaetian territory).
Lepontic is an extinct Celtic language that was spoken in parts of Rhaetia and Cisalpine Gaul (today's Northern Italy) between 700 BC and 400 BC. Sometimes called Cisalpine Celtic, it is considered a dialect of the Gaulish language and thus a Continental Celtic language (Eska 1998).
The language is only known from a few inscriptions discovered that were written in the alphabet of Lugano, one of five main varieties of Northern Italic alphabets, derived from the Etruscan alphabet. These inscriptions were found in an area centered on Lugano, including Lago di Como and Lago Maggiore. Similar scripts were used for writing the Rhaetic and Venetic languages, and the Germanic runic alphabets probably derive from a script belonging to this group.
Lepontic was assimilated first by Gaulish, with the settlement of Gaulish tribes north of the River Po, and then by Latin, after the Roman Republic gained control over Gallia Cisalpina during the late second and first century BC.
The grouping of all of these inscriptions into a single Celtic language is disputed, and some (including specifically all of the older ones) are said to be in a non-Celtic language related to Ligurian (Whatmough 1933, Pisani 1964). Under this view, which was the prevailing view until about 1970, Lepontic is the correct name for the non-Celtic language, while the Celtic language is to be called Cisalpine Gaulish. Following Lejeune (1971), the consensus view became that Lepontic should be classified as a Celtic language, albeit possibly as divergent as Celtiberian, and in any case quite distinct from Cisalpine Gaulish. Only in recent years, there has been a tendency to identify Lepontic and Cisalpine Gaulish as one and the same language.
While the language is named after the tribe of the Lepontii, which occupied portions of ancient Rhaetia, specifically an Alpine area straddling modern Switzerland and Italy and bordering Cisalpine Gaul, the term is currently used by many Celticists to apply to all Celtic dialects of ancient Italy. This usage is disputed by those who continue to view the Lepontii as one of several indigenous pre-Roman tribes of the Alps, quite distinct from the Gauls who invaded the plains of Northern Italy in historical times.
The older Lepontic inscriptions date back to before the 5th century BC, the item from Castelletto Ticino being dated at the 6th century BC and that from Sesto Calende possibly being from the 7th century BC (Prosdocimi, 1991). The people who made these inscriptions are nowadays identified with the Golasecca culture, which has been ascribed a Celtic identity (De Marinis, 1991). The extinction date for Lepontic is only inferred by the absence of later inscriptions.
The Ligures (singular Ligus or Ligur; English: Ligurians, Greek: Λίγυες) were an ancient people who gave their name to Liguria, which once stretched from Northern Italy into southern Gaul. According to Plutarch they called themselves Ambrones which means ¨people of the water¨. The Ligures inhabited what now corresponds to Liguria, northern Tuscany, Piedmont, part of Emilia-Romagna, part of Lombardy, and parts of southeastern France.
Classical references and toponomastics suggest that the Ligurian sphere once extended further into central Italy (Taurisci): according to Hesiod's Catalogues (early 6th century BC) they were one of the three main "barbarian" peoples ruling over the Western border of the known world (the others being Aethiopians and Scythians). Avienus, in a translation of a voyage account probably from Marseille (4th century BC) speaks of the Ligurian hegemony extending up to the North Sea, before they were pushed back by the Celts. Ligurian toponyms have been found in Sicily, the Rhône valley, Corsica and Sardinia.
It is not known for certain whether they were a pre-Indo-European people akin to Iberians; a separate Indo-European branch with Italic and Celtic affinities; or even a branch of the Celts or Italics. Kinship between the Ligures and Lepontii has also been proposed. Another theory traces their origin to Betica (modern Andalusia).
Numerous tribes of Ligures are mentioned by ancient historians, among them:
The Ligurian language was spoken in pre-Roman times and into the Roman era by an ancient people of north-western Italy and south-eastern France known as the Ligures. Very little is known about this language (mainly place names and personal names remain) which is generally believed to have been Indo-European; it appears to have shared many features with other Indo-European languages, primarily Celtic (Gaulish) and Italic (Latin and the Osco-Umbrian languages).
Xavier Delamarre argues that Ligurian was a Celtic language, similar to but not the same as Gaulish. His argument hinges on two points: firstly, the Ligurian place-name Genua (modern Genoa, located near a river mouth) is claimed by Delamarre to derive from PIE *genu-, "chin(bone)". Many Indo-European languages use 'mouth' to mean the part of a river which meets the sea or a lake, but it is only in Celtic that reflexes of PIE *genu- mean 'mouth'. Besides Genua, which is considered Ligurian (Delamarre 2003, p. 177), this is found also in Genava (modern Geneva), which may be Gaulish. However, Genua and Genava may well derive from another PIE root with the form *genu-, which means "knee" (so in Pokorny, IEW ).
Delamarre's second point is Plutarch's mention (Marius 10, 5-6) that during the Battle of Aquae Sextiae in 102 BC, the Ambrones (who may have been a Celtic tribe) began to shout "Ambrones!" as their battle-cry; the Ligurian troops fighting for the Romans, on hearing this cry, found that it was identical to an ancient name in their country which the Ligurians often used when speaking of their descent (outôs kata genos onomazousi Ligues), so they returned the shout, "Ambrones!".
Delamarre points out a risk of circular logic - if it is believed that the Ligurians are non-Celtic, and if many place names and tribal names that classical authors state are Ligurian seem to be Celtic, it is incorrect to discard all the Celtic ones when collecting Ligurian words and to use this edited corpus to demonstrate that Ligurian is non-Celtic or non-Indo-European.
Strabo on the other hand states "As for the Alps... Many tribes (éthnê) occupy these mountains, all Celtic (Keltikà) except the Ligurians; but while these Ligurians belong to a different people (hetero-ethneis), still they are similar to the Celts in their modes of life (bíois)."
The Ligurian-Celtic question is also discussed by Barruol (1999).